Saint Joseph

Joseph and Mary were from Nazareth. Nazareth, it means: “Vil­lage of the shoot”. Why is that name impor­tant? Joseph was of David’s line, the town of Nazareth was set­tled out of noth­ing about 100 years before the birth of our Lord. The founders of the vil­lage were return­ing Davidic exiles. They knew the prophecy of Jer­im­iah which said the Mes­siah would come after “70 weeks of years” or 7 x 70 = 490 years. The time was right, the lin­eage was still estab­lished. They were mov­ing back to the Promised Land. They knew some­one from the Davidic line would be the Mes­siah and the time seemed cor­rect. Why name the vil­lage Nazareth?


Broth­ers, a short while ago I was read­ing an arti­cle by a Chris­t­ian (likely a Catholic). In the piece, he gave some token accep­tance of God’s require­ment to obey and heed author­ity. Then he said some­thing like

But when faced with a tyrant, it is our God given duty to remove him. I thought Waaaa…?

How often is being a rebel, rebel­lious or rebel­lion itself men­tioned in the bible? It is over 100 times.

How often does God men­tion rebel­lion in a pos­i­tive light? I haven’t found one.

Blessed Mar­garet of Castello

Born in Massa Tra­baria Italy in 1287 to a proud and well off set of par­ents; she was, from birth, ugly, a dwarf, blind, hunch backed and had one leg 1 ½” shorter than the other which resulted in a life­long limp. Her par­ents were aghast and tried to hide her exis­tence. As her father, Pari­sio, was the Cap­tain of the Peo­ple, a pow­er­ful office, and a rich man they were suc­cess full in hid­ing her for 6 years. After a near dis­cov­ery by a vis­it­ing dig­ni­tary, her par­ents walled her up in a cell attached to a chapel in the woods and left her there for 16 years.

COVID-​19 Vaccines

USCCB State­ment: “In view of the grav­ity of the cur­rent pan­demic and the lack of avail­abil­ity of alter­na­tive vac­cines, the rea­sons to accept the new COVID-​19 vac­cines from Pfizer and Mod­erna are suf­fi­ciently seri­ous to jus­tify their use, despite their remote con­nec­tion to morally com­pro­mised cell lines.

Receiv­ing one of the COVID-​19 vac­cines ought to be under­stood as an act of char­ity toward the other mem­bers of our com­mu­nity. In this way, being vac­ci­nated safely against COVID-​19 should be con­sid­ered an act of love of our neigh­bor and part of our moral respon­si­bil­ity for the com­mon good.”

With regard to the AstraZeneca vac­cine, the bish­ops found it to be “more morally com­pro­mised” and con­se­quently con­cluded that this vac­cine “should be avoided” if there are alter­na­tives avail­able. “It may turn out, how­ever, that one does not really have a choice of vac­cine, at least, not with­out a lengthy delay in immu­niza­tion that may have seri­ous con­se­quences for one’s health and the health of oth­ers,” the bishop chair­men stated. “In such a case … it would be per­mis­si­ble to accept the AstraZeneca vaccine.”

While some phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies have been work­ing on a vac­cine for COVID-​19 with­out using morally com­pro­mised cell lines at all, oth­ers have been using such cell lines in either the design and devel­op­ment phase or the pro­duc­tion phase or in both. Still oth­ers have been mak­ing use of a morally com­pro­mised cell line only for a con­fir­ma­tory test of the vaccine’s effi­cacy. This leads many peo­ple who are con­cerned for the sanc­tity of human life to ask if it is eth­i­cal to accept any of the vac­cines that have some con­nec­tion to abor­tion[1].

In 1972, a female child was aborted in the Nether­lands, and cells from her kid­neys were extracted and devel­oped into the cell line now known as “HEK293.” “HEK” stands for “Human Embry­onic Kid­ney.” Cells from the HEK293 line have been com­monly used in bio­logic research since the late 70s.

The vac­ci­na­tions pro­duced by Pfizer and Mod­erna did not use HEK293 in their design, devel­op­ment, or pro­duc­tion, but did use cells from the line in a con­fir­ma­tory test, said the bishops.

While nei­ther vac­cine is com­pletely free from any con­nec­tion to morally com­pro­mised cell lines, in this case the con­nec­tion is very remote from the ini­tial evil of the abor­tion,” said the bishops.

Con­versely, the vac­cine pro­duced by AstraZeneca “should be avoided if there are alter­na­tives avail­able,” said the bish­ops, as this vac­cine is “more morally compromised.”

The HEK293 cell line was used in the design, devel­op­ment, and pro­duc­tion stages of that vac­cine, as well as for con­fir­ma­tory test­ing,” said Rhoades and Nau­mann. The two com­pared the AstraZeneca vac­cine to the cur­rent rubella vac­cine, which also was reliant on “morally com­pro­mised cell lines.”[2]

So what does our Bishop say? I have it on good author­ity, from some­one deep within the Dioce­san Admin­is­tra­tion Offices (also known as St. Michael’s West) that the Bishop agrees with the state­ments above and has no posi­tion on the ques­tion of ask­ing his flock to get the vac­cine. He leaves that deci­sion up to us.

So how do the Pfizer and Mod­erna vac­cines work? They both use a novel and some­what new tech­nol­ogy called mRNA or mes­sen­ger RNA. Accord­ing to the CDC, mRNA mol­e­cules are injected into mus­cle tis­sue with some of the mRNA pass­ing through the local cell walls. There it does what its name sug­gests and it deliv­ers a “mes­sage” to pro­duce a protein.

Remem­ber all those images of the COVID-​19 virus that look like a ball with “spikes” ema­nat­ing from the sur­face? Well the ball sec­tion con­tains the COVID repli­ca­tion code and tricks the cell into mak­ing many copies of its self. This con­tin­ues until the cell is exhausted or pops. As the copies of the virus are being made, other sys­tems in the cell rec­og­nize they do not belong and they are ejected from the cell mem­brane. The “spikes” are a pro­tein which is the mech­a­nism the virus uses to “open” the cell wall, pass by its nat­ural defenses, and “set up shop” to make more virus from within.

Back to the vac­cine; the mRNA from the vac­cine tells the cell to make a sec­tion of the COVID-​19 spike pro­tein, or the com­plete spike pro­tein (depend­ing on who’s vac­cine you get). The cell rec­og­nizes the pro­teins do not belong and ejects them; this stim­u­lates the immune sys­tem to rec­og­nize the spikes and there­fore the whole COVID-​19 virus. The immune sys­tem fol­lows by gen­er­at­ing anti­bod­ies to destroy the COVID-​19 virus. The mRNA from the shot has a very short life and poses no dan­ger to the body, it soon dis­solves away. It should be noted that the mRNA never pen­e­trates the nucleus and never comes in con­tact with the DNA of the cell.

Although sci­en­tists have been research­ing mRNA vac­cines in gen­eral for the last 10 years or so, this is the 1st actual appli­ca­tion of this cat­e­gory of vac­cines in human population.

Now that’s a lot to pray and think about!


[2] US bish­ops approve use of coro­n­avirus vac­cines with ‘remote con­nec­tion’ to abor­tion — CNA Staff, Dec 14, 2020